3 de dez. de 2011

Boa dia caranguejada!


Hoje vou antecipar a edição de nossa coluna já que exatamente esta hora amanhã estarei um tanto quanto... Digamos... Inapto para digitar, uma vez que estarei em um enlace matrimonial muito importante de um casal muito especial para mim cujo me sinto honrado em além de fazer parte do corpo de padrinhos da noiva, darei-lhes do fundo do meu coração a benção e chuva de arroz para fartura, além de outras tradições que eu amo. Quais? 

Se vestir bem, cumprimentar gente cheirosa, dar aquela coçada disfarçada no saco no altar para o cinegrafista não pegar este take terrível, trabalhar a panturrilha ansioso para ir para a festa onde o "bambu quebra no meio" gravatas na testa, aquela parente distante que te tira para dançar a valsa, a temida passagem da gravata para ajudar a noite de núpcias, presenciar as solteironas disputando o "bouquet" (de flores), dançar de terno me faz lembrar aquele pulinho do Raúl Gil, lembram?


Arrotar a loiruda gelada, rir de doer o abdômen, não ligar para nada a não ser a trilha sonora e adereços distribuídos onde a margem para o criativo e o coma alcoólico andam claudicantes e de mãos dadas, comer até soltar a fivela, sair de casa como o Ronnie Von e voltar como o  Paulo César Pereio, dar aqueles pulinhos para tirar o sapato apertado com o pé que já virou uma broa de milho e outras coisas que eu amo! Fora as fotos, os amigos, a descontração e pompa que uma festa a la Amaury Jr. compete! 

Felicidades aos noivos e que Deus abençoe e cubra de luz, proteção, harmonia, união, paciência e que não esqueçam jamais, que um padrinho serve muito mais do que dar presentes e sim, dar os conselhos que forem necessáros a hora que for, seja onde for e pelo motivo que for!



Astróloga do terra.com.br + aquário = Esta pode ser uma fase mais voltada para si mesmo. Uma serie de emoções e sentimentos do passado podem voltar para serem definitivamente eliminados. Amor e intimidade em alta. Cuidado com as ilusões. (Relaxa, posso beber, mas respeito a madrinha que fará par comigo, mas como está em alta o amor e a intimidade, já adianto em caso de dúvidas: Yes, I Do!) hahahahahahahah.

Pratique sei inglês, e não gaste seu latim: 

"Married" and "Matrimony" redirect here. For other uses, see Married (disambiguation) and Matrimony (disambiguation).

Definitions:

“Marriage is the union of two different surnames, in friendship and in love, in order to continue the posterity of the former sages, and to furnish those who shall preside at the sacrifices to heaven and earth, at those in the ancestral temple, and at those at the altars to the spirits of the land and grain.” Confucius.

Anthropologists have proposed several competing definitions of marriage so as to encompass the wide variety of marital practices observed across cultures.

In his book The History of Human Marriage (1921), Edvard Westermarck defined marriage as "a more or less durable connection between male and female lasting beyond the mere act of propagation till after the birth of the offspring."

In The Future of Marriage in Western Civilization (1936), he rejected his earlier definition, instead provisionally defining marriage as "a relation of one or more men to one or more women that is recognised by custom or law".

The anthropological handbook Notes and Queries (1951) defined marriage as "a union between a man and a woman such that children born to the woman are the recognized legitimate offspring of both partners."[7] In recognition of a practice by the Nuer of Sudan allowing women to act as a husband in certain circumstances, Kathleen Gough suggested modifying this to "a woman and one or more other persons."

Edmund Leach criticized Gough's definition for being too restrictive in terms of recognized legitimate offspring and suggested that marriage be viewed in terms of the different types of rights it serves to establish. Leach expanded the definition and proposed that "Marriage is a relationship established between a woman and one or more other persons, which provides that a child born to the woman under circumstances not prohibited by the rules of the relationship, is accorded full birth-status rights common to normal members of his society or social stratum".

Leach argued that no one definition of marriage applied to all cultures. He offered a list of ten rights associated with marriage, including sexual monopoly and rights with respect to children, with specific rights differing across cultures.

Duran Bell also criticized the legitimacy-based definition on the basis that some societies do not require marriage for legitimacy, arguing that in societies where illegitimacy means only that the mother is unmarried and has no other legal implications, a legitimacy-based definition of marriage is circular. He proposed defining marriage in terms of sexual access rights.

Etymology.

The modern English word "marriage" derives from Middle English mariage, which first appears in 1250–1300 C.E. This in turn is derived from Old French marier (to marry) and ultimately Latin marītāre (to marry) and marītus (of marriage).

History of marriage by culture

A pair of wedding rings.

Although the institution of marriage pre-dates reliable recorded history, many cultures have legends concerning the origins of marriage. The way in which a marriage is conducted and its rules and ramifications has changed over time, as has the institution itself, depending on the culture or demographic of the time.

Various cultures have had their own theories on the origin of marriage. One example may lie in a man's need for assurance as to paternity of his children. He might therefore be willing to pay a bride price or provide for a woman in exchange for exclusive sexual access.

Legitimacy is the consequence of this transaction rather than its motivation. In Comanche society, married women work harder, lose sexual freedom, and do not seem to obtain any benefit from marriage.[14] But nubile women are a source of jealousy and strife in the tribe, so they are given little choice other than to get married. "In almost all societies, access to women is institutionalized in some way so as to moderate the intensity of this competition."

Forms of group marriage which involve more than one member of each sex, and therefore are not either polygyny or polyandry, have existed in history. However, these forms of marriage are extremely rare. Of the 250 societies reported by the American anthropologist George P. Murdock in 1949, only the Caingang of Brazil had any group marriages at all.

Various marriage practices have existed throughout the world. In some societies an individual is limited to being in one such couple at a time (monogamy), while other cultures allow a male to have more than one wife (polygyny) or, less commonly, a female to have more than one husband (polyandry). Some societies also allow marriage between two males or two females. Societies frequently have other restrictions on marriage based on the ages of the participants, pre-existing kinship, and membership in religious or other social groups.

Vai um cocktail, cerveja, vinho, champagne, whisky, água, Engov, SAMU?

Nenhum comentário:

Postar um comentário